Shein Basketball Sports Shoes That Look Like Air Jordan 11 Sneakers Get Roasted Over Twitter

Shein Basketball Sports Shoes, a popular online retailer, recently dropped a new sneaker release that drew immediate attention due to its striking resemblance to the iconic Air Jordan 11. However, instead of generating excitement, the sneakers became the target of ridicule on Twitter. This article explores the humorous reactions, potential legal repercussions, and the subsequent removal of the controversial Shein Basketball Sports Shoes website.

Outrage and Bootleg Accusations

Twitter users wasted no time expressing astonishment and disbelief at Shein’s latest sneaker release. The resemblance between the Shein sneakers and the Air Jordan 11 was so uncanny that many accused Shein of shamelessly producing bootleg replicas without proper licensing.

Twitter user @ajlalh couldn’t help but point out the absence of copyright protection, exclaiming, “No copyrights on the design? This is the cleanest, most outrageously blatant bootleg I’ve ever seen.”

Adding a touch of sarcasm, @Cis4CookiiDotCo tweeted, “Wait… Shein is selling Jordans. Jumpman sold separately tho.”

User @admancorb joined in, humorously stating, “Fordan 11s to go with my Fucci bag and Folex watch,” emphasizing the perceived knock-off nature of Shein’s product.

Shein’s Sneakers: A Familiar Resemblance

Described as non-slip “professional basketball sports shoes for men,” the Shein sneakers were available at a discounted price of $49.99, a significant 67 percent reduction from the original retail price of $149.99. These shoes resemble the Air Jordan 11, particularly regarding the signature patent leather mudguard.

However, it’s important to note that Shein’s version lacked certain distinctive features in the authentic Air Jordan 11, such as the carbon fiber plate.

With social media buzzing over Shein’s controversial release, Twitter users quickly speculated on the potential legal ramifications for Shein and its parent company, Nike, which owns the Jordan Brand.

User @5T33ZY humorously remarked, “Nike lawyers have entered the chat,” hinting at the likelihood of legal action being taken.

@deesmoothj86 added to the jest, suggesting it would be an easy win for Nike’s legal team, stating, “Layup for that Nike legal team, lol.”

Witty Nicknames and Mockery

In addition to the criticism and legal speculations, Twitter users showcased their creativity by coming up with amusing nicknames for Shein’s sneakers, further adding to the mockery surrounding the release.

@deltron3k coined the term “ConMancords,” cleverly referencing the iconic “Concord” colorway of the Air Jordan 11.

User @Imchiilin playfully referred to them as “Boneless Jordans,” while @design4thought humorously dubbed them “Bredless 11’s,” paying tribute to the Air Jordan 11 “Bred” colorway.

The Short-Lived Jokes and Sneaker Removal

While the jokes and laughter continued to circulate on social media, the lifespan of Shein’s sneakers was short-lived. Shortly after the social media frenzy, Shein removed the controversial sneakers from its website.

The removal could be seen as an attempt to avoid potential legal repercussions or to salvage the brand’s reputation in the face of negative publicity. Regardless of the reasons behind the removal, Shein’s sneakers became a brief yet memorable spectacle in the sneakerhead.

The Impact and Aftermath

The uproar caused by Shein’s sneaker release highlighted social media’s power and passionate sneaker enthusiasts’ influence. While the sneakers’ controversy garnered attention and generated buzz, it also highlights the importance of originality and legal compliance within the fashion industry.

Shein’s swift action in removing the sneakers from its website demonstrated a recognition of the potential consequences and the need to address the situation promptly.

However, the incident serves as a cautionary tale for brands and retailers, emphasizing the importance of conducting thorough research, obtaining proper licenses, and avoiding infringement of established designs.

This incident serves as a reminder that authenticity and respect for intellectual property are critical elements for any brand.